For groups, MSOs and health systems
At multi-site scale the questions change. Not whether APCM is worth running, but whether it is being run consistently, and whether you could prove it.
And what the software does about each one.
One office documents consent properly and another does not. Per-location reporting shows enrollment, revenue and blocked counts side by side.
Every enrollment, edit, billing mark and payout is attributed to a person and readable by user, which is what §164.312(b) asks for.
Standing monthly run-rate and annualised value per site and per provider, separate from what has actually been claimed and collected.
If staff are paid per enrollment, what is owed and to whom is a report rather than a spreadsheet someone maintains.
This page is for you if: You run primary care across multiple locations and need the program to be uniform, measurable and defensible.
Every practice runs this differently. Tell us how yours works and we will come back with what it would take.
Request a proposal